JIEP: The Journal of Islamic Economics Perspectives. The International Journal that published by State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Jember in cooperation with The Indonesian Association of Islamic Economist (IAEI), The Sharia Economy Community (MES) and The Indonesian Economist Scholar Association (ISEI). The journal will focus on providing quality research in the areas of Economics Science, Islamic economics, Sharia economics law, sharia banking & finance, and halal product. Accordingly, papers that focus on emerging and interdisciplinary topics are encouraged. The goal of the journal is to provide research that is relevant and applicable to a diverse set of Islamic economics researchers and professionals. The Journal is published twice a year in March and September. The aim of the journal is to disseminate these topics :
• Islamic economics
• Islamic banking
• Islamic finance
• Islamic accounting
• Islamic microfinance
• Investment and Capital Market
• Zakah, waqf, and philanthropy
• Insurance / Takaful
• Halal product
Muhammad Fauzinudin Faiz, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember, Indonesia
Nur Hidayat, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember, Indonesia
Khamdan Rifa’i, State Islamic Institute of Jember, Indonesia
Lucik, State Islamic Institute of Jember, Indonesia
Akhmad Sulthony, State University of Jember, Indonesia
Kuwat Ismanto, State Islamic Institute of Pekalongan, Indonesia
Advisory Editorial Board
Abdul Nasir Haji Abdul Rani, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University Brunei Darussalam
Zeinoul Abedien Cajee, Chartered Accountant (South Africa), National Awqaf Foundation of Awqaf South Africa
Yusuf Risanto, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Irwan Tri Nugroho, The State University of Sebelas Maret Solo, Indonesia
Zainal Fannani, The University of Airlangga Surabaya, Indonesia
Khairunnisa Musari, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember, Indonesia
Ahmad Fathan Aniq, McGill University, Montreal - Canada
Isnadi, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember, Indonesia
Alfan Khumaidi, Al Azhar University, Cairo
Assistant to the Editor
Mashudi, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember, Indonesia
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
Articles submitted must be original, research-based, never published before and not in the process of review that may be published in other publications.
Articles have been written in standard English and Arabic with a space of 1.5 with the size of the Garamond font size 12 in A4 sized paper using the Microsoft Word format (doc or Docx). Articles must be sent through the Article Submission menu with article lengths of 5,000 to 10,000 words.
Articles have complied with writing and bibliographic rules contained in the writing rules (Author Guidelines).
The article includes abstracts of 150-200 words and 5 keywords. All articles must be sent through the Submit Article menu.
The citation using the Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note) style, and has been created using Mendeley or Zotero citation software.
Arabic transliteration follows the transliteration guidelines of the Arabic Library of Congress (LC) or McGill Arabic Transliteration.
In general, the structure of writing JIEP scientific articles (The Journal of Islamic Economics Perspectives) is organized into three parts, namely the beginning, discussion, and conclusion. In the first part (1), the article must include the title, name and affiliation, abstract, and keywords. The title is made by taking into account the economic principles of the word, denotative diction, and of course, must reflect the contents of the article. Name and affiliation refer to the author's name, the original institution, and e-mail address. Abstracts are arranged in English with a range of 75-100 words. On keywords, a maximum of six words is listed which are the main topics of the article.
Meanwhile, in the discussion section (2), each article is organized into two different models depending on the writing category. ِِِ As a concept of scientific writing, this writing is organized into three sub-sections, namely introduction, discussion, and closing. In the introduction, the article is broken down into the context of the subject of study (concept or discourse) and its relevance in the development of related disciplines; followed by a sub-discussion that reviews all themes or problems that support the details of the research subject along with the probability of the consequences; and then concludes with sub-conclusions which reveal conclusions and their implications for theory and practice and a number of important recommendations related to the development of discourse in the related scientific domain. Then, especially for articles categorized as research results, both library research and field research, the IMRaD model is used as a writing structure. IMRaD is a general organizational structure in scientific writing for academic journals consisting of four subsections, namely introduction, study methods, research results, and discussion. In the sub-introduction, articles must reveal the entire context of the study, starting from the reason why the analysis unit (subject or object of research) is interesting and important to learn, the main problem (research question), hypothesis, to the purpose and significance of the study. Then, in the research sub-method, articles must reveal all the methods used and how the operations are applied in the assessment. Specifically for the types of research results, this sub-section must also be disclosed when and where research is conducted, who are the parties involved, and what data is used. Furthermore, in the sub-results of the study, articles must show and review all research findings that are treated as an attempt to answer the problem proposal. Finally, in a further sub discussion which is the concluding part, the article must reveal a number of conclusions, theoretical implications, limitations of research, and a number of recommendations that can be followed up by reviewers or subsequent researchers to develop the future. research result. Of course, all categories of articles, both reviews of papers and research papers, must be able to show novelty in the findings.
As for the final part (3), each article must be closed with the inclusion of all the references referred to in the assessment. The bibliography is written using the Turabian style pattern (See JIEP's Writing Guidelines).
Articles that are submitted must be original, research-based, never published and not in the process of review that may be published in other publications.
1. Articles are written in standard English or Arabic with a space of 1.5 with a size 12 Garamond font on A4 sized paper using the Microsoft Word format (doc or Docx). Articles must be sent through the Article Submission menu with article lengths of 5,000 to 7,000 words. The manuscript should be in no less than 25 pages long
2. Structure of the manuscripts
a. Title. The title should be brief, short, clear, and informative which reflect the article content. The length of the title maximum of 12 words. Each word of the title should be started with a capitalized letter.
b. Author’s names and institutions. The author’s names should be accompanied by the author’s institutions, affiliation address and email addresses, without any academic titles and/or job title.
c. Abstract. The abstract should be less than 200 words. Abstract contains a clear statement of the background of the study, the purpose of the study, method, result, and implication, with no references cited. Keywords should be 2 to 5 phrases.
d. Introduction. The introduction describes a brief background of the novelty, state of the arts, and objective (s). It should be written efficiently and supported by references. It should be written without numbers and/or pointers.
e. Literature Review. This section explains the theoretical framework used in this research, a review of the previous research in the area.
f. Methods. This section describes the tools of analysis along with the data and their sources.
g. Result and Discussion. This section explains the results of the study. Data should be presented in Tables or Figures when feasible. There should be no duplication of data in Tables and Figures. The discussion should be consistent and should interpret the results clearly and concisely, and their significance, supported by the suitable literature. The discussion should show relevance between the result and the field of investigation and/or hypotheses. The discussion also should compare the result with previous research.
h. Conclusions. This section concludes and provides policy implications, if any, of the study.
i. Acknowledgment (if any) to the person(s) or institution(s) who help the experiment should be stated.
j. References. This section lists only the papers, books, or other types of publications referred to in the manuscript. References should be the last 10-year publication with minimum of 80% of the journal. References should be listed alphabetically by the author(s) last name(s) and the year of publication. We suggest authors to use reference management software like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc., to prepare citations and the list of references.
3. All entries will be reviewed by an editorial board and language editor team, by the peer-review mechanism. Articles that do not comply with the provisions of the theme, format, and length of the article will be rejected without going through the review process.
4. Articles sent must include abstracts of 150-200 words and at least 4- 5 keywords.
5. A citation must use footnotes and references that refer to the Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note) format. Articles whose is made using Mendeley or Zotero citation software are preferred.
6. All articles must be submitted through the Submit Article menu.
7. Tables and figures should be presented as follows:
a. The name of tables and figures should follow a numbering system (Arabic numbering system). The names of the tables and figures are on the top of the tables and figures.
b.The tables and figures should provide the source of information, if any, at the bottom part of both.
c.Table format should contain only heading and contents. Please provide the top and bottom lines, along with the line(s) that separate the heading and the contents. Example:
8. Arabic transliteration uses the Times New Arabic font and Transliteration McGill University with the following references:
9. Writing footnotes and bibliography follows the following references: (using the Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note) style, and has been created using Mendeley or Zotero citation software.)
Nur Hidayat, “The Contribution of Nusantara Moslem Local Tradition on Micro Finance Risk Management in Indonesia,” International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (IJIBEC), January 26, 2018, 77, doi:10.28918/ijibec.v1i2.996.
Angelo M. Venardos, ed., Current Issues in Islamic Banking and Finance: Resilience and Stability in the Present System (Singapore ; Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 2010).
Saheed Abdullahi Busari and Sikiru Olanrewaju Aminu, “The Application of Ar-Rahan-Based Microcredit Facility as an Alternative Instrument for Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria,” Journal of Islamic Finance 6, no. 1 (January 2017): 51–64, doi:10.12816/0042733.
Nur Hidayat and Aprilya Fitriani, Gurihnya Pembiayaan Kulinar Di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Q-Media, 2019).
Brounen, Dirk, Kees G. Koedijk, and Rachel A.J. Pownall. “Household Financial Planning and Savings Behavior.” Journal of International Money and Finance 69 (December 2016): 95–107. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.011.
Busari, Saheed Abdullahi, and Sikiru Olanrewaju Aminu. “The Application of Ar-Rahan-Based Microcredit Facility as an Alternative Instrument for Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria.” Journal of Islamic Finance 6, no. 1 (January 2017): 51–64. doi:10.12816/0042733.
Eriksson, Kent, and Cecilia Hermansson. “Searching for New Saving Behavior Theories: How Relationships between Banks’ Customers and Advisors Affect Household Saving.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 32, no. 4 (May 27, 2014): 279–99. doi:10.1108/IJBM-03-2014-0040.
Fisher, Patti J., and Rui Yao. “Gender Differences in Financial Risk Tolerance.” Journal of Economic Psychology (August 2017): 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.03.006.
Moeller, Lioudmila, and Vladislav Valentinov. “The Commercialization of the Nonprofit Sector: A General Systems Theory Perspective.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 25, no. 4 (August 2012): 365–70. doi:10.1007/s11213-011-9226-4.
Book References, the format should follow the following example:
Brounen, Dirk, Kees G. Koedijk, and Rachel A.J. Pownall. “Household Financial Planning and Savings Behavior.” Journal of International Money and Finance 69 (December 2016): 95–107.
Busari, Saheed Abdullahi, and Sikiru Olanrewaju Aminu. “The Application of Ar-Rahan-Based Microcredit Facility as an Alternative Instrument for Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria.” Journal of Islamic Finance 6, no. 1 (January 2017): 51–64
Eriksson, Kent, and Cecilia Hermansson. “Searching for New Saving Behavior Theories: How Relationships between Banks’ Customers and Advisors Affect Household Saving.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 32, no. 4 (May 27, 2014): 279–99.
Fisher, Patti J., and Rui Yao. “Gender Differences in Financial Risk Tolerance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 61 (August 2017): 191–202.
Moeller, Lioudmila, and Vladislav Valentinov. “The Commercialization of the Nonprofit Sector: A General Systems Theory Perspective.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 25, no. 4 (August 2012): 365–70.
The copyright notice can be read here :
a. The author holds the copyright and gives the journal the right of the first publication of the work to be simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License which allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship of works and initial publications in this journal.
b.All material contained in this site is protected by law. It is prohibited to quote part or all of the contents of this website for commercial purposes without the approval of this journal editing board.
c. If you find one or several articles contained in JIEP that violate or potentially violate the copyrights that you have, please report to us, via email on Primary Contact.
d.The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles listed on this journal site refers to the provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike license (CC BY-SA).
e.All information contained in JIEP is academic. Our Editorial Team is not responsible for any losses incurred due to misuse of information from this site.
The name and e-mail address on this site will be used as well as possible for journal correspondence purposes and is not used for purposes other than journals,
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement :
The Journal of Islamic Economics Perspective (JIEP) is a peer-reviewed journal, published two times a year by Faculty of Islamic Business and Economics, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember (IAIN) Jember Indonesia. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher.
Duties of Authors
1. Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
3. Plagiarism Screening: It is basically the author’s duty to only submit a manuscript that is free from plagiarism and academically malpractices. The editor, however, double checks each article before its publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against offline database developed by Faculty of Islamic Business and Economics, State Institute for Islamic Studies of Jember (IAIN) Jember Indonesia and, secondly, against as much as possible online databases. Similarity checking by Turnitin no more than 25 %.
4. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: The Author should not, in general, submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
6. Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made a significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgment section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
8. Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Duties of Editor.
1. Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
2. Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
3. Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
4. Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without the written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest.
Duties of Reviewers
1. Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
2. Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
3. Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work.
4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of the double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
5. Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of the manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.
JIEP has no APCs (article processing charges), submission charges, or another fee. Articles are submitted to JIEP via the JIEP journal management system. Anyone is free to register on this system and submit an article. Submission and article processing for publication is free of charge.
Faculty of Isliness and Economics State Institut For Islamic Studies of Jember
Jl. Mataram No. 1, Mangli, Jember, 68136
M Fauzinuddin Faiz Editor in Chief IAIN Jember
Faculty of Islamic Business and Economics State Institut For Islamic Studies of Jember
Jl. Mataram No. 1, Mangli, Jember, 68136
Phone: +62331487550 Fax :+62331427005
Nur Hidayat Phone: +628124939442
Online Submission Guideline